By
Emmanuel Udom
The
Chairman of Gani Fawehinmi Memorial Organisation, Comrade Ayodele Akele on
Thursday in Lagos, literarily took President Muhammadu Buhari to the cleaners,
over his on-going anti-corruption war and campaign promises to Nigerians.
Speaking
during the six year anniversary lecture of the demise of Gani Fawehinmi,
founder of the National Conscience Party, (NCP), Akele argued that the
anti-corruption war of Buhari is being wagged only on the pages of newspapers.
His
words: contrary to the body language and recent utterances of Buhari, who
claims to be Mr Clean and Mr Integrity, the president has not constitutional
backing to jail any corrupt leader, since he is not a court.
Speaking
further, Akele disclosed that members of the National Conscience Party across
the country will continue to tackle the All Progressives Congress-led
government of Buhari, who promised to crush Boko Haram in two months, even as
emerging indices showed that the president has not capacity to flush out
terrorist in Nigerian before December, this year.
He
called on the president to fulfill all the campaign promises made to Nigerians,
such as the feeding of all school children, the crushing of terrorists and the
delivery of democracy dividends to the citizens of our country without delay.
Meanwhile,
Acting Chairman of the National Conscience Party,(NCP), in Lagos, Fatai Ibu-Owo
during the lecture reminded the president that the late Gani Fawehinmi, founder
of NCP outlined a 10-point poverty
abolition agenda for the country.
Ibu-Owo
mentioned the points as: employment care, food care, health, care, housing
care, education care, water care, electricity care, transportation care,
telecommunication care and security care.
The
Lagos NCP leader further disclosed that all over the world, good governance
means being with the people, knowing their pains, abolishing their poverty and
solving their problems.
However,
in Nigeria, once politicians have either been elected or rigged into power,
they govern for themselves and not for the people, who are supposed to be the
beneficiaries of democracy dividends in the first place.
No comments:
Post a Comment